If they wanted to not lose control of it (have it discontinued, become
closed source, or otherwise) they probably shouldn't have sold it in the
first place, or at the very least structured the deal in such a way so that
something like this wouldn't be possible (although I don't know much about
the deal and whether or not this would be something that would have been
feasible to do, legally).

/2 cents

On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Ragi Y. Burhum <[email protected]> wrote:

> Monty's call for help:
> http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2009/12/help-saving-mysql.html
>
>
> A different take - one I agree more with (with a few exceptions)
> http://bit.ly/3nrfH9
>
> Honestly, I am biased since I am strong PostgreSQL proponent.
>
> What do you guys think?
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxUsers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers
>
>
_______________________________________________
LinuxUsers mailing list
[email protected]
http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers

Reply via email to