The most important thing I'm concerned with is user friendliness. Ease of implementation. Secondarily, speed of connection.
thanks On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Paul Saenz <[email protected]>wrote: > That's "ONE BIG" nutshell, but perfect timing. I was trying to put tightvnc > on my 10.04 client and 8.04 server, and neither put and xstartup file in my > .vnc file. I don't know if they have changed it and put it somewhere else, > but I doubt it. I couldn't find anything about it with google. It also said > that it could not shut down because it couldn't find the pid file. > > I liked tight because the stuff I read said that it doesn't actually send > the desktop over the wire, but the desktop is created on the client box. I > figured that this would make the connection faster. > > If anyone has suggestions for remote access, I'd love to hear it. The > remote comparison looks great, but I think it will take me a week to go > through that. > > Thanks > Paul > > > On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Chris Penn <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> http://www.remotedesktopmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/chart-1-1024.jpg >> >> >> >> -- >> "As we open our newspapers or watch our television screens, we seem to >> be continually assaulted by the fruits of Mankind's stupidity." >> -Roger Penrose >> _______________________________________________ >> LinuxUsers mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers >> > >
_______________________________________________ LinuxUsers mailing list [email protected] http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers
