Sorry Michael, I couldn't resist that one.
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Paul Saenz <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, look at the bright side..., at least you didn't get shot for not > doin it Dante ! :>D > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 9:38 PM, Dante Lanznaster <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Michael Sokolov <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> And not a very good one at that, given your inability to run that Nokia >>> D50 upgrader successfully. The other person who had offered to do it >>> (and who will be getting a well-deserved check from me at this Wednesday's >>> meeting) has succeeded on the very first try, the same evening when I >>> gave him the pointer to the software file and the IP address of the DSLAM. >>> >>> Sorry, couldn't resist. >>> >>> MS >>> >>> P.S. The following excerpt from my tcpdump log is a hint as to why >>> Dante's attempts to push code to my D50 had failed miserably: >>> >>> TYPE I >>> 200 Type set to I, binary mode >>> PORT 192,168,254,251,202,6 >>> 200 Port set okay >>> STOR utsSys.o >>> >>> I did mention that I don't believe in NAT, didn't I? >>> >> >> Just so the other people are aware of the factors, that D50 upgrade >> has as much to do with Windows as MalwareBytes has to do with >> Linux. Sorry I couldn't help you, but having to install that NT4 VM >> ended up being out of question given my current assignments. >> >> Yes, I am behind a NAT, and yes, *everything* else works just fine. >> I can host stuff on my computer and I can send out data that >> complies with a well-defined *standard*, if you know what I mean. ;) >> >> -- >> Dante >> >> P.S.: I'm glad the other person got a check for this. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LinuxUsers mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers >> >> > _______________________________________________ LinuxUsers mailing list [email protected] http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers
