That is not what I was looking for, May be you looked at the question with a different perspective, But thanks for the answer. Regards, Kiran :)
On Jun 13, 9:09 pm, Daniel Eggleston <[email protected]> wrote: > I'll go out on a limb and assume you're trying to decide which one to > download. The 2.4 line has a slightly different architecture than the 2.6 > one. 2.6 is newer, and in most cases better, than 2.4. If you have (for > example) some old proprietary software that comes with kernel modules > compiled only for the 2.4 kernel, or you are trying to install in limited > space (think floppy disk), 2.4 is the way to go. Anything modern (especially > supporting modern hardware) should go 2.6. > On Jun 13, 2011 10:01 AM, "joey" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > I visited the linux kernel website (kernel. org), there are lots > > different kernels, > > by that I don't mean the changelog, patch or stable versions, > > > I mean what is the difference between versions like "stable 2.4.37.11" > > and "stable 2.6.39.1"? > > > Waiting for answers, > > Regards, > > Kiran :) > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Linux Users > Group. > > To post a message, send email to [email protected] > > To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] > > For more options, visit our group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/linuxusersgroup> Please remember to abide by > our list rules (http://tinyurl.com/LUG-Rulesor > > http://cdn.fsdev.net/List-Rules.pdf) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Linux Users Group. To post a message, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit our group at http://groups.google.com/group/linuxusersgroup Please remember to abide by our list rules (http://tinyurl.com/LUG-Rules or http://cdn.fsdev.net/List-Rules.pdf)
