Yes, that is fine. The pointer jumping around is only mini-annoyance for most part; especially if you added some sort of discard of zero values into xdrv.
I think it makes sense to add kernel fix at same time as looking at my gesture patches because they compliment each other. In fact, my current code requires the kernel patch because I do no debouncing and things get very confused because of it. Looking forward to the new release! Chris On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Ping Cheng <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Chris, > > Thank you for the patch and your new solution. I like it. > > However, I would hold your patches (this one and the one for X driver) > to the next release (-11) since I really want to get -10 out this > week. This way we have more time to work on your solution while the > community test Jason's patchset. Does this work for you? > > Ping > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Chris Bagwell <[email protected]> wrote: >> OK, attached is my suggested fix for this. It fixes messages on X >> side for limited cases I've tested so far. >> >> I went a slightly different route then discussed earlier and I reset >> past history so an exact value can always be sent. If you think >> touching dev->abs[] values would be rejected from linux kernel then >> same basic history framework is needed for +/- 1 work around anyways. >> >> I also fixed an issue bugging me with static variables in same code >> but not 100% related to lost data. It could be submitted separate. >> >> Same basic concepts apply in at least tpc code paths. If patch is >> acceptable, I can help port to other areas of code. >> >> Chris > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Linuxwacom-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-devel
