On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 06:35:03PM -0700, Ping Cheng wrote: > On Monday, August 30, 2010, Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> wrote: > > The properties cannot match up in height _and_ width, only one of the two. > > Which one depends on the TwinView settings. > > > > We also require that at least one resolution matches the screen resolution > > and that neither of the values is larger than the screen resolution for the > > given dimension. > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> > > --- > > On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 06:06:47PM -0700, Ping Cheng wrote: > >> On Friday, August 27, 2010, Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > The properties cannot match up in height _and_ width, only one of the > >> > two. > >> > >> Although only one set is usable at a time, we may still want to > >> safeguard both sets since both sets are writable props by the client > >> no matter which one matches. > > > > something like this then? > > Yeah. But if you are going to remove TwinView next round, there may be > no need to update this patchset any more.
bisectability and revertability. Generally, we should never skip on a patch because of a future patch. At some point the other patch may need to be reverted, at which point you'd be moving back to a potentially broken state. except that if that's a few months or years in the future, we may have forgotten about it and waste time debugging a bug that had been known already. Cheers, Peter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program Be part of this innovative community and reach millions of netbook users worldwide. Take advantage of special opportunities to increase revenue and speed time-to-market. Join now, and jumpstart your future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-atom-d2d _______________________________________________ Linuxwacom-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-devel
