After consulting with Ping, the CVS repositories are going to be retired. With SourceForge hinting at a possible end-of-life for CVS service it seems like a good idea to take a preemptive step and consolidate everything under Git.
However, while preparing the pull the plug I've run into a small snag: the legacy linuxwacom code is hosted in three repositories that all disagree to some extent. The linuxwacom-dev and linuxwacom-prod repositories on CVS are the most up-to-date as far as version tags go, but have different histories and tags. The linuxwacom repository on Git is slightly less up-to-date, but does have a few patches the others don't -- including the complete removal of kernel code. Any thoughts on which version we want to use, or how we should merge the code/commits/tags between them? Jason --- Day xee-nee-svsh duu-'ushtlh-ts'it; nuu-wee-ya' duu-xan' 'vm-nvshtlh-ts'it. Huu-chan xuu naa~-gha. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ Linuxwacom-devel mailing list Linuxwacom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-devel
