On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Cedric Sodhi <man...@gmx.net> wrote: > Hello, I find it rather inconvenient that the Area Option (rather recent > GIT) appears to depend on the output device and is relative to the > screen area. > Meaning that the same Area Options have different effects when I use two > different screen setups. > > Is there a particular reason why that is the case? I think the Area > Option should be independent of that. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the > growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses > are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software > be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker > today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar > _______________________________________________ > Linuxwacom-devel mailing list > Linuxwacom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-devel >
Could you explain the problem in a little more detail? Does Area have a different effect than setting TopX/TopY/BottomX/BottomY used to? Jason --- Day xee-nee-svsh duu-'ushtlh-ts'it; nuu-wee-ya' duu-xan' 'vm-nvshtlh-ts'it. Huu-chan xuu naa~-gha. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar _______________________________________________ Linuxwacom-devel mailing list Linuxwacom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-devel
