OK, I was able to reproduce your testing on a D1 of 1420/9200 using
evtest though.  I couldn't reproduce with xinput test because
xf86-input-wacom averaging.  Even when I set Sample to 1, I still
couldn't do it.  So something else on X side is averaging as well (or
we have a bug in Sample logic).

So I suspect maybe someone computed the original max mistakenly from X
reported max's instead of HW reported.

To give additional weight, it seems Wacom is being slightly
conservative in what they advertise in active area on our small
tablets.  Since we are able to do 0.2mm/1mm greater, its small but
still bigger area.

So its highly doubtful that Wacom would advertise a bigger active area
on mediums then what can actually be supported.

I'm leaning towards we bump all the 0xDx medium Bamboo's to the size
you mention.

For now, here's for the input-wacom patches you sent:

Reviewed-by: Chris Bagwell <ch...@cnpbagwell.com>

Chris


On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Favux ... <favux...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't know where they came from.  I think some Wacom literature only
> lists inches so there could be a rounding error.  But usually they
> list both and I'm pretty sure they convert from cm to inch.
>
> In Calibration on the HOW TO page you can see me manually testing my
> D1 with xinput test (as you described earlier) and it came out to 0,0
> 14720,9200.  I think that's probably better than you'd do with
> xinput_calibrator.
>
> The D5 tester did say "I tried copying the parameters from device 0xD4
> and the tablet seems to be working with its most basic
> functionalities. How lucky!"  After I had him redo with the submitted
> patches he was happy that it was working so well and reported
> everything was good.  I wouldn't feel real comfortable asking him to
> do a calibration with xinput test.  I did ask that he pay special
> attention to calibration.  But if it isn't short how likely is it he'd
> notice it?
>
> Dave
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop 
What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses
from deploying virtual desktops?   How do next-generation virtual desktops
provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable
virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/
_______________________________________________
Linuxwacom-devel mailing list
Linuxwacom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-devel

Reply via email to