On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Jason Gerecke <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Peter Hutterer > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 09:29:13AM -0700, Jason Gerecke wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Jason Gerecke <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Fourth round of modifications to xsetwacom's MapToOutput command. >>> > This patch set no longer adds an AspectRatio property to the driver, >>> > instead relying on xsetwacom to do-the-right-thing with the Area >>> > property. This has the potential to break user scripts, but the >>> > probability of it actually having any fallout is fairly low. >>> > >>> > Patches in this series are for the most part numbered one higher >>> > than their v3 counterparts due to the addition of a new patch at >>> > the top of the stack which introduces the 'wacom-util.h' header >>> > for macros that aren't specific to the driver or xsetwacom. >>> > >>> > >>> >>> Been a while with no input on the patches. I'm not sure if its because >>> I've scared everyone away with my comment on patch 8/8 (which only >>> applies to that single patch, not the whole set), or because the >>> remaining 7 patches are good enough for merging. I can't (cleanly) fix >>> patch 8 without some shuffling some other code around, so if the first >>> 7 are good to be merged then they should get in; I'll then re-submit >>> patch 8 along with the other changes in a separate patchset. >> >> sorry. I'm absolutely swamped at the moment and just haven't been able to >> review them yet. >> >> Cheers, >> Peter >> >> > > Gotcha. I wasn't sure what the status was, and figured it was about > time to poke the list again. I've got some more patches in development > that shouldn't be disturbed by this patchset remaining in limbo for a > while longer, so don't worry too hard about getting these reviewed > ASAP :) > > Jason > > --- > Day xee-nee-svsh duu-'ushtlh-ts'it; > nuu-wee-ya' duu-xan' 'vm-nvshtlh-ts'it. > Huu-chan xuu naa~-gha. >
Put on the maintainer hat that Peter suggested I try out and have merged the patches (after appropriate modifications). The Signed-off-by and Reviewed-by lines didn't make it upstream (...I forgot to add them to my local repo before pushing...), but otherwise I think it was a success. At least, there don't *appear* to be any indications of a smoking crater in the direction of SourceForge :D Jason --- Day xee-nee-svsh duu-'ushtlh-ts'it; nuu-wee-ya' duu-xan' 'vm-nvshtlh-ts'it. Huu-chan xuu naa~-gha. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ Linuxwacom-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-devel
