On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:42:03AM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 14:52 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutte...@who-t.net> > > Signed-off-by: Bastien Nocera <had...@hadess.net>
thanks. fwiw, the s-o-b tag usually signifies that you wrote or passed on the patch. http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/linuxwacom/index.php?title=SubmittingPatches (which largely links to the kernel doc anyway) We've been using Acked-by or Reviewed-by, depending on how confident you are with the patch content and review. Can I assume that all yours are Reviewed-by then? Cheers, Peter > > > --- > > libwacom/libwacom.h | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/libwacom/libwacom.h b/libwacom/libwacom.h > > index 7591f64..e8d0b80 100644 > > --- a/libwacom/libwacom.h > > +++ b/libwacom/libwacom.h > > @@ -329,6 +329,8 @@ int libwacom_has_stylus(WacomDevice *device); > > int libwacom_has_touch(WacomDevice *device); > > > > /** > > + * Tablet buttons are numbered 'A' through to 'A' + number of buttons. > > + * > > * @param device The tablet to query > > * @return The number of buttons on the tablet > > */ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Linuxwacom-devel mailing list Linuxwacom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-devel
