On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 15:24 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 03:48:17PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 15:02 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutte...@who-t.net> > > > > Is this wise? The tool isn't supposed to be installed, or is it? If it > > is, then we shouldn't be starting with trying to read the DB from the > > local source tree. > > The tool is installed as libwacom-list-local-devices. I know the approach > isn't ideal, but this is the closest I found to having both the local > database work as well as the installed one. > > The database searchpath is defined through TOPSRCDIR and unless we can > somehow change this on install, we'd otherwise have to go for either always > using the system database or always the local one.
The best would be to have 2 compilations of the program then, with different defines. Otherwise the details of the build tree would be leaked out (or it needs to find another way to detect that it's in the source tree). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Linuxwacom-devel mailing list Linuxwacom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-devel
