On 17/10/12 17:22 , Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> Peter Hutterer said the following on 10/17/2012 12:12 AM:
>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 04:40:14PM +0200, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
>>> Hi Peter,
>>>
>>> Peter Hutterer said the following on 10/16/2012 07:35 AM:
>>>> [...]
>>>> git bisect claims this broke make check (dbverify segfaults). Can
>>>> you please
>>>> double-check that? thanks.
>>> Well, actually, this is not a segfault but an assert() which fails.
>>>
>>> Reason it fails is because it compares the definition in the old
>>> database against the new one, problem these patches add new
>>> information that were not present in the older database so these
>>> tests will necessarily fail each time we add new information to the
>>> existing entries of the database.
>> dbverify doesn't really have a old/new database though. it loads the
>> database once, writes it to a file, then re-reads that file as new
>> database
>> and compares it to the original. Theory goes that the two databases
>> have to
>> be identical, otherwise either write or read is broken.
>>
>> In my case it breaks on the first I4 tablet, so I suspect the LED stuff
>> either doesn't print correctly, compare correctly or read correctly*.
>> This is
>> the real problem we need to find.
>
> Oh crap yes, it's not the right patch that was pushed in git :-(
>
> The one which was pushed in git reads "StatusLEDs=" and writes "LEDs="
> so it would indeed fail...
>
> The correct one was:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=29918039
>
> I shall send a fix to get to the same level as that one then.

if that's the only difference, just revert the current patch and apply 
the right one on top, no need to diff the two up.

Cheers,
   Peter

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
_______________________________________________
Linuxwacom-devel mailing list
Linuxwacom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-devel

Reply via email to