Hi Joel,

a couple of comments inline.

On 23 Oct. 2013, at 22:07 , Joel M. Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com> wrote:

> I look forward to discussing these drafts at the meeting.
> 
> Personally I am a bit confused and uncertain as to what to think about 
> whether the allocation is useful.
> 

Well… having the slots at the meeting will give the opportunity to clarify ;-


> The draft starts with some motivations which seem to depend upon everyone 
> using IPv6 EIDs from the block, as otherwise it appears that the decision can 
> not be made as described

The point was more about avoiding penalizing non-LISP traffic while identifying 
LISP traffic. With such information different policies/TE can be applied on 
each traffic type.

But I can agree that the text needs more clarification.

> 
> Then it gets to the argument about needing EIDs that are not advertised in 
> BGP.  This seems to make sense.  That is where we want to end up. And blocks 
> which are not for Internet advertisement are not apparently what you get from 
> RIRs or even requests for PI space.
> 
> But then I wondered.  What about PITRs?  Even if we say that the EID block is 
> for cases where addresses are not in the BGP table, the PITRs will need to 
> advertise portions of the block.  As far as I can tell from the deployment 
> models, we can not even require that the EID block only be advertised as a 
> whole, since there seem to be cases for partial advertisement by PITRs that 
> only serve part of the space.
> 

True. 
Yet, we may propose some specific policies to apply to PITR (e.g., not 
deaggregating more than a certain point, if a certain PITR does not service a 
certain part of the block it can tunnel the traffic to someone that does).

Thanks for your comments


Luigi

> So I am back to not knowing quite what works.
> Yours,
> Joel
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
lisp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Reply via email to