I’ll remember to comment and possibly show an example with ascii art. Dino
> On May 2, 2016, at 1:22 PM, Joel M. Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com> wrote: > > I can live with that here. I think the text in the VPN draft is going to be > "interesting". > > Yours, > Joel > > On 5/2/16 4:19 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote: >>> I would like to at least see a sentence indicating that if a >>> configuration of egress processing needs instance IDs that differ on >>> the upper 8 bits, they need separate ETR instances. >> >> See the new change below. I assume what you mean by “separate ETR >> instances”, that if the high order bits are the same, the ETR should be >> configure with a unique 24-bits. Please confirm. >> >> Dino >> >> >> _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list lisp@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
