I support WG adoption of draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf. From: lisp <lisp-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:lisp-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of Luigi Iannone <g...@gigix.net<mailto:g...@gigix.net>> Date: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 at 7:16 AM To: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org<mailto:lisp@ietf.org>> Cc: "lisp-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:lisp-cha...@ietf.org>" <lisp-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:lisp-cha...@ietf.org>> Subject: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specific LCAF [draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt]
The call ends August 10th 2017 ! Luigi On 26 Jul 2017, at 11:41, Luigi Iannone <g...@gigix.net<mailto:g...@gigix.net>> wrote: Hi All, During the 99th IETF authors of the document draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00] asked for WG adoption. Meeting participants expressed consensus on adoption. This message begins the two weeks call for WG adoption to confirm the meeting outcome. The call ends on August 3rd 2017. Please respond to the LISP mailing list with any statements of approval or disapproval. Recall that: - This is not WG Last Call. The document is not final, and the WG is expected to modify the document's content until there is WG consensus that the content is solid. Therefore, please don't oppose adoption just because you want to see changes to its content. - If you have objections to adoption of the document, please state your reasons why, and explain what it would take to address your concerns. - If you have issues with the content, by all means raise those issues and we can begin a dialog about how best to address them. Luigi and Joel
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list lisp@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
