> The suggested name is “LISP Mobility, Deployment and Traceroute 
> considerations”.
> 
> The chairs would like to hear from the mailing list if there is any objection 
> or you have a better name to suggest.

I don’t have a name suggestion (for the 3 items included in one document) but I 
would like to support an idea that Albert provided after the meeting today. 

He suggested to put the Mobility sections in an Appendix in RFC6830bis and put 
Deployment and Traceroute considerations in a document that now can be called 
“draft-ietf-lisp-oam”.

Wonder how people would feel about that?

Dino

_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
lisp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Reply via email to