Any change to lisp-intro should be done by discussion with the RFC
Editor, as it is in the RFC Editor queue (pending reference completion).
If the working group considers it acceptable, we could easily ask them
to change the references to 6830 and 6833 to the bis documents (after
all, it is alreay blocked by documents which depend upon those.)
Yours,
Joel
On 9/10/18 11:27 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
If you guys have source for the intro doc, I could point it to bis
documents?
Dino
Begin forwarded message:
*Resent-From:* <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
*From:* Alvaro Retana <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
*Date:* September 10, 2018 at 2:22:21 PM PDT
*Resent-To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>,
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>, [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>, [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>, [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
*To:* "The IESG" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
*Cc:* [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>, Luigi Iannone
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>, [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* *Alvaro Retana's No Objection on
draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-16: (with COMMENT)*
Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-16: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for the work on this document!
I have some relatively minor comments/nits:
(1) §18: s/RFC8060/RFC8061
(2) §1: "Finally, [I-D.ietf-lisp-introduction] describes the LISP
architecture." First of all, it would seem to me that the
Architecture should
be a Normative reference...but I-D.ietf-lisp-introduction says that it
"is used
for introductory purposes, more details can be found in RFC6830, the
protocol
specification." This document obsoletes rfc6830...so it seems to me
that there
is a failed circular dependency.
(3) References to rfc2119/rfc8174 and rfc8126 should be Normative.
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
