FYI

This may be of some interest for lispers since it is about addressing …

Ciao

L.


> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: Jiayihao <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Int-area] Internet addressing: Problem statement and Gap analysis
> Date: 16 July 2021 at 13:58:57 CEST
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> 
> Dear all,
>  
> We have submitted two companion I-Ds on issues regarding Internet addressing, 
> continuing the discussion on Internet addressing started at IETF110.
>  
> The first draft 
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jia-intarea-scenarios-problems-addressing/
>  
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jia-intarea-scenarios-problems-addressing/>)
>  provides an update on various communication scenarios and issues identified 
> in those scenarios regarding addressing. Those issues lead ultimately to 
> outlining a problem statement for a discussion to re-think the approach to 
> extensions to Internet addressing.
>  
> The second draft 
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jia-intarea-internet-addressing-gap-analysis/
>  
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jia-intarea-internet-addressing-gap-analysis/>)
>  builds on this problem statement by providing an analysis of extensions to 
> identified key properties of Internet addressing. Those extensions are 
> presented along various methodologies for realizing them and examples that 
> have done so, while their existence is being seen as evidence for the 
> existence of gaps to the original Internet addressing albeit filling those 
> gaps through a plethora of point extensions rather than a coherent 
> architectural approach. It is this point extension approach that has led to a 
> number of issues, such as complexity, fragility, among others, that the draft 
> outlines. 
>  
> We are soliciting feedback from this community on the problems, issues, and 
> gaps identified in those drafts, e.g., in terms of issues missed, extensions 
> (to Internet addressing) to be added but also towards the aim of these drafts 
> to stimulate discussion on how we can progress Internet addressing for future 
> uses.
>  
> Best regards,
> Yihao Jia (on behalf of all authors)
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area 
> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Reply via email to