Sure, this is a reasonable comment. Dino
> On Aug 2, 2021, at 8:52 AM, Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]> wrote: > > In the discussion at the session, it was suggested that the distinguished > names are distinguished because of instance IDs. > > If that is the intention, the draft needs to clearly state that this is to be > done using its own instance ID, that no other use of distinguished names > shall be made within that instance ID, and explain how the xTRs in need of > policy information will derive or receive the relevant instance ID. > > Yes, all of those are doable. > But they need to be stated. > > Yours, > Joel > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
