Yes i think you are right. Any attempt to generalize at this point will probably fail.
--szb Cell: +972.53.2470068 WhatsApp: +1.650.492.0794 > On Nov 12, 2021, at 17:11, Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well you just need to list the features LISP-fix and LISP-nexagon need and > you state what mechanisms in LISP deliver those features. I think you have > done that in the drafts. > > Dino > >>> On Nov 12, 2021, at 5:02 PM, Sharon Barkai <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Nov 12, 2021, at 15:04, Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> 6. Both lisp-nexagon and lisp-fix do not change the protocol. But you do >>>> have to understand the map assisted overlay ucast/mcast >>> >>> I don't understand what you mean. Say more please. >> >> I mean, if you didn't know LISP, you would need to reinvent its mechanisms, >> the layering, the mapping, the signal-free… per app domain, the hard way, >> proprietary.. >> > _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
