Dear authors: I only have a couple of major comments (see below). I am starting the IETF LC and expect the comments to be addressed with any other last-call comments before starting the IESG Evaluation in a couple of weeks.
Luigi: One of the comments is related to the IANA assignment (mostly a formality) -- the change will require a minor update to the Shepherd writeup. Just out of curiosity: how much deployment has rfc8060 seen? Thanks! Alvaro. [Line numbers from idnits.] ... 84 3. Vendor Specific LCAF ... 91 0 1 2 3 92 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 93 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 94 | AFI = 16387 | Rsvd1 | Flags | 95 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 96 | Type = 255 | Rsvd2 | Length | 97 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 98 | Rsvd3 | Organizationally Unique Identifier (OUI) | 99 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 100 | Internal format... | 101 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ [major] s/255/TBD/g See the comment in the IANA section below. ... 135 4. Security Considerations 137 This document enables organizations to define new LCAFs for their 138 internal use. It is the responsibility of these organizations to 139 properly assess the security implications of the formats they define. [major] Please add text indicating that the security considerations in rfc8060 apply ... 146 6. IANA Considerations 148 Following the guidelines of [RFC8126], this document requests IANA to 149 update the "LISP Canonical Address Format (LCAF) Types" Registry 150 defined in [RFC8060] to allocate the following assignment: [] The registry is called "LISP LCAF Type". I'm not sure why IANA chose to abbreviate the name (from "LISP Canonical Address Format (LCAF) Types", which is what rfc8060 specified). No change needed; I will send them a note. 152 +---------+---------------------+-------------------------------+ 153 | Value # | LISP LCAF Type Name | Reference | 154 +---------+---------------------+-------------------------------+ 155 | 255 | Vendor Specific | Section 3 | 156 +---------+---------------------+-------------------------------+ [major] The assignment is subject to the review of the Designated Experts. For now we need to go through the process: NEW> IANA is asked to assign a value (255 is suggested) for the Vendor Specific LCAF from the "LISP Canonical Address Format (LCAF) Types" registry as follows: +---------+---------------------+-------------------------------+ | Value # | LISP LCAF Type Name | Reference | +---------+---------------------+-------------------------------+ | TBD | Vendor Specific | [This Document], Section 3 | +---------+---------------------+-------------------------------+ [EoR -09] _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
