On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 10:35 PM <mohamed.boucad...@orange.com> wrote:
> > In Section 5: > > > > "If the Map-Server removes the subscription state, it SHOULD > > notify the xTR by > > sending a single Map-Notify with the same nonce but with Loc-Count > > = 0 (and > > Loc-AFI = 0), and ACT bits set to 5 "Drop/Auth-Failure"." > > > > Why is this only a SHOULD? > > [Med] This is an optimization. We are consuming up to 4 messages to cover > the specific case where the xTR sent a Map-Notify-Ack but was lost in > transmission, while 3 would be just OK when there is an issue in the > Map-Server-to-xTR forwarding path. What we had initially in mind is to have > a provision for a policy to disable this. > I think you should include something that indicates why one might legitimately not do what the SHOULD says. Otherwise, I can do it either way and expect to interoperate, but I don't understand the choice I'm making. -MSK
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list lisp@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
