> RFC 8060: LISP Canonical Address Format (LCAF) [This is largely used and may > be merged with 9306]
Merging the two makes good sense to me. Alberto From: Luigi Iannone <g...@gigix.net> Date: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 10:47 AM To: lisp@ietf.org list <lisp@ietf.org> Cc: lisp-cha...@ietf.org <lisp-cha...@ietf.org> Subject: Rechartering Thread 2: From Experimental to ST: these are a bunch of RFC that may be considered Hi LISP WG, As for the subject, this email starts the discussion about: From Experimental to ST: these are a bunch of RFC that may be considered to move ST There are a few experimental RFCs which is worth to be considered to be moved to standard track (if we have documented deployment experience), namely: RFC 6832: Interworking between Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) and Non-LISP Sites RFC 8060: LISP Canonical Address Format (LCAF) [This is largely used and may be merged with 9306] RFC 8111: Locator/ID Separation Protocol Delegated Database Tree (LISP-DDT) [The only scalable Mapping System so far…..] Multicast can be another one work item. RFC 6831: The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) for Multicast Environments RFC 8378: Signal-Free Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) Multicast Please send us back your thoughts. Padma and Luigi
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list lisp@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
