LISP geo-location decided to use the encoding format consistent and coordinated with the routing protocols.
Dino > On Apr 17, 2024, at 11:59 PM, Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.i...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hello Dino and Alberto > > The Yang Doctor review had comments on Yang -20 draft regarding the geoloc. > For reference comment from Joe Clark > As to the two questions asked here, I can see some benefit of breaking out > the IANA parts of address-types into a module that they maintain. But in its > current form, I don't know that it makes sense to have them maintain it. As > for geoloc, I do see some overlap, but I am not a LISP expert at all, so I > cannot comment as to whether bringing that whole module in makes sense or > would even work with LISP implementations. That is, it seems LISP lat and > long are expressed in degrees° minutes'seconds" whereas geoloc does this as a > decimal64 from a reference frame. I do feel that whatever direction is > taken, text explaining why geoloc is not used is useful. > > Per Med's comment on groupings - > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/lJ7jBJzjJNY2P4sQgCcLuSnnzds/ > > Consolidating these comments in a single thread here for resolution and > discussion on the list before the refresh, > > Thanks > Padma and Luigi > > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list lisp@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
