I think this is what transpired. (1) we wrote lisp-geo with exact packet syntax as RFC 8060. (2) We received comments from Enke, Naiming, Chris Hopps, and Acee. (3) We changed the format to be consistent with OSPF, ISIS, and BGP (the lisp-geo Document Change section documents this and when). (4) I asked if we could change RFC 8060 and pretty sure Luigi said yes.
That’s my memory. Dino > On Apr 26, 2024, at 6:07 PM, Joel Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com> wrote: > > It's up to Luigi and Padma, but my read is that if it was private it was not > a WG decision. > > Yours, > > Joel > > On 4/26/2024 6:05 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote: >>> Can you find an on-list email where such a conclusion was reached. That >>> would certainly explain your choice. >> I searched (before I sent the last email) and could not find anything. >> Likely it was private. >> >> Dino _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list lisp@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
