I will captialize. Dino
> On Jun 22, 2024, at 9:24 AM, Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.i...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > HI Dino > > Thanks for the updates. From draft-ietf-lisp-te > > Otherwise, when the S-bit is set and an > xTR determines the RLOC is not reachable, it must not use any of > the remaining entries in the ELP list and drop the packet. > > > > > > Shouldn't this be a "MUST not"? > Otherwise all my comments have been addressed. > > Padma > > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 3:16 PM Dino Farinacci <farina...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Here is where i wonder whether strict would have been best to drop the > > packet and not go to n+1 per the example for SFC where there are mandatory > > services. > > > > I think it might be worthwhile to document this behavior so as there are no > > surprises. > > Thoughts? > > Will add. Thanks. > > Dino > > _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list -- lisp@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to lisp-le...@ietf.org
