Hi Dino, Jim, Padma and myself discussed about your request concerning lisp-decent.
It is our opinion that since the current charter does not support the work and because less than a year ago the WG did not show interest in the work [1] it is more appropriate if this document is submitted to the ISE stream. Thanks Ciao L. [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/h36AtLQY_7zsz9Ytw-gafFaonU8/ > On 18 Jun 2024, at 00:10, Dino Farinacci <farina...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Since multiple LISP mapping systems *was* in the charter, I would like to > request this document to be a working group document: >  > > This mapping system scales really well and is easier to configure and > requires less multi-organizational coordination than LISP-DDT. I have > implemented it and test scaled it to 1M mapping entries across a 10 > map-server cluster size. > > Are there any objections to making this a working group document? > > Dino_______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list -- lisp@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to lisp-le...@ietf.org
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list -- lisp@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to lisp-le...@ietf.org
