> This exposes my only high-level knowledge of the protocol itself. Maybe add a > reference to [RFC9301] here as well.
I will add. >> >>> 2. In section 5, the final sentence fragment didn't parse and it >>> wasn't obvious to me how to edit it - "As well as identifying >>> the router name...". >> >> Fixed. Thanks. >> >>> 3. In section 9.2, The description of the onboarding process includes >>> very specific details that aren't fully explained. Would it be >>> possible to describe the use case at a higher level? >> >> This is some text from the cisco guys. I don't know how to change that. They >> have the intellectual property on it. > > That’s fine with me then. It was just unclear to me how a DN would provide > stability to the reliable transport session - would this allow the session to > be recovered using a different UDP for? I don't know. I have copied Marc Portoles explicitly so he can comment. Thanks, Dino _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list -- lisp@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to lisp-le...@ietf.org
