Hi Team, I have been reviewing the draft-ietf-lisp-group-mapping-00 as requested by Alberto and I didn’t find any conceptual issues for now. I spotted a few typos :
2. <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lisp-group-mapping-00#section-2> Introduction<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lisp-group-mapping-00#name-introduction> 1. A 1:1 mapping of a an overlay multicast flow, either a (Source, Group) or (*, Group) to an underlay group. 4. <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lisp-group-mapping-00#section-4> Source Site Procedures<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lisp-group-mapping-00#name-source-site-procedures> The Source Site Procedures from [I-D.farinacci-lisp-rfc8378bis<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-farinacci-lisp-rfc8378bis-00>] are followed for overlay nodes and [I-D.farinacci-lisp-rfc6831bis<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-farinacci-lisp-rfc6831bis-02>] for non-overlay nodes. There are no modifications to these procedures other than the source multicast site -ITR should be capable of replicating to multiple G-RLOC and U-RLOC addresses from its map-cache. 5. <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lisp-group-mapping-00#section-5> Hashed Based Underlay Group Selection<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lisp-group-mapping-00#name-hashed-based-underlay-group> When an ETR receives an IGMP/MLD report it needs to decide which G-RLOC to underlay join to join in the underlay. 7. <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lisp-group-mapping-00#section-7> Receiver Site Procedures<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lisp-group-mapping-00#name-receiver-site-procedures> The Receiver Site Procedures from [I-D.farinacci-lisp-rfc8378bis<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-farinacci-lisp-rfc8378bis-00>] are followed. This draft adds an additional step to the procedure on how should to select the G-RLOC address for registration. Best regards, Raphael From: Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal) <na...@cisco.com> Date: Wednesday, 23 October 2024 at 23:38 To: lisp-cha...@ietf.org <lisp-cha...@ietf.org> Cc: Raphael Lienard (rlienard) <rlien...@cisco.com>, Marc Portoles Comeras (mportole) <mport...@cisco.com> Subject: IETF LISP Multicast Reviews Hi Luigi, Padma, I spoke with Raphael and Marc, they both have multicast expertise and are willing to take a quick look at the multicast documents (below) draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6831bis-00 draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8378bis-00 draft-ietf-lisp-group-mapping-00 Thanks a lot for the help here folks! Any preference on which draft to take a look at? Thanks! Alberto
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list -- lisp@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to lisp-le...@ietf.org
