> 1. As for RFC2026: The "Experimental" designation typically denotes a > specification that > is part of some research or development effort. > > This document is part of a development effort to include geo-coordinates in > LISP. Is not part of an “experiment", as not all experimental RFC are > necessarily part of an experiment. It is about the maturity level of the > technology.
If Deb is okay with this text, I will add to document. > 2. The history of LISP. > > Long story short, LISP was born as a big experiment and the WG chartered only > to produce informational and experimental documents. With the deployment > experience gathered through the years, the LISP WG has rechartered to move > the most mature pieces of LISP to STD Track, but not all the pieces. This is informational for Deb. And I think everyone agrees something like this shouldn't go in this specific document. Otherwise it would need to go in every LISP document. Please ack or nak this Deb and other reviewers. Dino _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
