Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > It's not 'new', and it's not a draft: > > 2142 Mailbox Names for Common Services, Roles and Functions. D. > Crocker. May 1997. (Format: TXT=12195 bytes) (Status: PROPOSED > STANDARD) Um, maybe my English isn't all that great, but the word 'PROPOSED' would sure seem to imply that this isn't quite FINAL yet. Thus, if we have problems, and at least some of us do, and we know where to complain, and surely some of us know both where and how to do THAT, then there is still time, brother! And based on the stuff Michael B. posted, it sounds like his interpretation is completely valid and within the letter of the RFC, though only the drafter could say for sure if it is within the intended spirit. -- Mike Nolan
