At 03:10 PM 1/31/99 -0800, you wrote:
>I am also still waiting for anyone's definition of 'spam'.
>Thanks,
>Ivan
>
I'd much rather hear why netnames has seen fit to send their advertisements,
-repeatedly- to several non-commercial mailing lists to which I subscribe.
I believe that satisfies any common definition of 'spam', so I doubt any
of us need to give any further explanations of your actions.
You provide a haven for spam drop-boxes. People, in general, don't like
it. You've chosen your profession so, quit whining that some of us
disapprove and live with your choice, as we live with our choice to block
out some of the domains you house. Ultimately, it's the decision of an ISP's
users, whether they wish to stay with an ISP who blocks spam. If they
want to receive it, they'll go to an ISP who accepts it, don't you think?
