On Thu, Feb 25, 1999 at 01:00:20PM -0600, Mike Nolan wrote:
> Regarding the recent discussion on html-aware mailers (pine, I think),
> was that the UNIX version or pc-pine? As a long-time character-based UNIX
> and elm user, I find the UNIX versions of pine both limiting and annoying
> at times, and I've never had much luck with pc-pine. (Or taken the time
> to learn X, which always strikes me as the wrong solution, no matter what
> the problem is.)
>
> Too bad elm doesn't have the html engine from lynx in it.
For all intents and purposes, mutt does. It has ability to run lynx in
the background to decode the html and capture it for viewing within mutt.
I like it. It's clean, simple, and elegant.
David
--
David Shaw | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | WWW http://www.jabberwocky.com/
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
"There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX.
We don't believe this to be a coincidence." - Jeremy S. Anderson