At 10:54 AM 3/5/99 -0500, Rich Kulawiec wrote: >I think this is a pretty straightforward idea: to put it bluntly, if you >can't handle 100+ messages a day, don't sign up for mailing lists which >deliver 100+ messages a day. Or, if you do, then it is up to *you*, >the end user, to ensure that you have appropriate tools to deal with it. What is the corollary here? It is up to the list manager to provide the user no help, since it should be as hard as possible for them to be on our lists? After all, being on a mailing list *should* be a punishment for something. -- I'm going to change my name to 'Squawk' because that is what my parrots call me. Nick Simicich mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] or (last choice) mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://scifi.squawk.com/njs.html -- Stop by and Light Up The World!
- Putting the listname on the Subject line Bernie Cosell
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line Rasmus Lerdorf
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject li... Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subjec... Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Putting the listname on the S... Nick Simicich
- Re: Putting the listname on t... Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Putting the listname on the S... Rasmus Lerdorf
- Re: Putting the listname on t... Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Putting the listname ... Rasmus Lerdorf
- Re: Putting the listname on t... Nick Simicich
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subjec... Mitch Collinsworth
- Re: Putting the listname on the S... Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Putting the listname on the S... David W. Tamkin
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subjec... David W. Tamkin
- Re: Putting the listname on the Subject line Nick Simicich
