>>Hmm, either I'm confused here or you are. (And I'm necessarily >>assuming it's you.) Oh, this is a typo. I re-editted the parenthetical and screwed up the meaning. I meant to say I'm NOT necessarily assuming it's you. Please accept my apology for this. >Are we somehow getting bogged down in minutia and failing to see that >there's a forest of change occurring here -- and it's not necessarily >a harbinger of *good* change? Of course we are. List managers are by definition if not by necessity, tenders of minutia! :-) -Mitch
- InterNIC is History Vince Sabio
- Re: InterNIC is History Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: InterNIC is History Vince Sabio
- Re: InterNIC is History Mitch Collinsworth
- Re: InterNIC is History Vince Sabio
- Re: InterNIC is History Mitch Collinsworth
- Re: InterNIC is History Dr. Rob Higgins
- Re: InterNIC is History Vince Sabio
- Re: InterNIC is History Vince Sabio
- Re: InterNIC is History Mitch Collinsworth
- Re: InterNIC is History Vince Sabio
- Re: InterNIC is History Nathan J. Mehl
- Re: InterNIC is History Mitch Collinsworth
- Re: InterNIC is History Joe Smith
