Dave wrote: > At 09:28 PM 4/1/98 -0500, Woodrick, Ed wrote: > > > Why do yall go through so much trouble to not utilize existing > >Internet messaging standards? > > I filter out HTML messages for two simple reasons: They make digest > versions of my lists unreadable to many s*bscribers, and they increase the > size of messages with no increase in value. I also don't allow HTML messages on my list. And to expand on the undreadable issue, I have had blind list subscribers write to me to thank me for the fact that my mailing list and web site are simple plain text based. Keeping lists accessable to blind readers is yet another reason for not complicating simple text discussion with overhead for uneeded color and fonts. Color and fonts do not improve discussion. -- Michelle Dick [EMAIL PROTECTED] East Palo Alto, CA
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Michael C. Berch
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Russ Allbery
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Aaron Schrab
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Jason Rasku
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists J. Philip Miller
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Kynn Bartlett
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Norbert Bollow
- RE: HTML-enabled mailing lists Dave Voorhis
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Michelle Dick
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Michael C. Berch
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Kynn Bartlett
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Subir Grewal
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Michelle Dick
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Linda Allison
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists johnjohn
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Lawrence Weeks
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists MowMow Kitty
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Rich Kulawiec
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists James C. Armstrong
