Woodrick, Ed writes: > And for those of you who are > stuck on UNIX using readers that only stand regular text messages, don't > gripe and complain that the rest of us decided to move on and leave you > in the 60's. Now, let's get the facts straight here. UNIX is the 70s, not the 60s. And the standard pagers don't just support plain text---they also support bboollddffaaccee and _u_n_d_e_r_l_i_n_e. (For those of you with deficient MUAs: That was ``boldface'' in bold and ``underline'' underlined. For UNIX readers who saw the effects and would like some vi macros: ftp://koobera.math.uic.edu/pub/software/exrc.) Of course, the control codes are teletype-compatible, so they'll also work for people who really are stuck in the 60s. [Sorry if this message shows up twice---the first copy was mangled by a deficient MUA that I've been trying out.] ---Dan Smaller, faster, safer than inetd+tcpd. http://pobox.com/~djb/ucspi-tcp.html
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Michelle Dick
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Linda Allison
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists johnjohn
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Lawrence Weeks
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists MowMow Kitty
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Rich Kulawiec
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists James C. Armstrong
- RE: HTML-enabled mailing lists Claire McNab
- RE: HTML-enabled mailing lists Jason Rasku
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists D. J. Bernstein
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists D. J. Bernstein
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Christopher Davis
- RE: HTML-enabled mailing lists Mike Nolan
- RE: HTML-enabled mailing lists Woodrick, Ed
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Rich Kulawiec
- RE: HTML-enabled mailing lists Dave Voorhis
- RE: HTML-enabled mailing lists Kersti Anear
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Rich Kulawiec
- RE: HTML-enabled mailing lists Chris Pepper
- RE: HTML-enabled mailing lists Todd Day
- RE: HTML-enabled mailing lists James Lick
