At 09:26 a.m. 04/21/98 -0700, Douglas Fajardo wrote: > While the language being used is quite controlled and proper (so >Far! :), >I feel obliged to point out that this is no longer a civil discussion, >but is (IMHO) >on the verge of becoming a "holy war" or even degenerating into a simple >Feud. Actually, it was pretty much over, done, dead, finished -- until you popped up and let the same thing rear its ugly head again. -- __ __ _ _ _ Mailing List Services | \/ | | (_)___| |_ ___ for the Internet Community | |\/| | | | / __| __/ __| http://www.mlists.com/ | | | | |___| \__ \ |_\__ \ (Free list hosting available!) |_| |_|_____|_|___/\__|___/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: HTML-enabled mailing lists Todd Day
- RE: HTML-enabled mailing lists James Lick
- RE: HTML-enabled mailing lists Ken Hooper
- RE: HTML-enabled mailing lists Kynn Bartlett
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Erich L. Markert
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Woodrick, Ed
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Manar Hussain
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Dave Voorhis
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Linda Allison
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Douglas Fajardo
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Kynn Bartlett
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Jason Rasku
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Rich Kulawiec
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Russ Allbery
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Mike Nolan
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Rich Kulawiec
- Re: HTML-enabled mailing lists Jason Rasku
- RE: HTML-enabled mailing lists Woodrick, Ed
- RE: HTML-enabled mailing lists Kynn Bartlett
- RE: HTML-enabled mailing lists Dave Voorhis
- RE: HTML-enabled mailing lists murr rhame
