Jason L Tibbitts III said:
> >>>>> "BH" == Bill Houle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> BH> These lists insist on addressing directly to me (instead of a
> BH> list address) and do not utilize Precedence headers.
>
> What does the envelope sender look like? I'd ignore anything matching
> /owner|request|error/i (and probably a few more).
procmail has a built-in FROM_DAEMON test that covers this scenario
as well.
I'm back now, with no nastygrams in my mailbox, so at least the
autoresponder did not go completely haywire while I was out...
I've noticed a trend toward PC-based "mail merge" style list manager
software. This software creates individual messages addressed
directly to each subscriber, with the headers looking no different
than if they had sent the mail one-on-one directly. These were the
ones I was worried most about. Neglecting to follow standards, such
as the lack of even a Precedence or Sender header, pretty much make
this a case of "they screwed up" as I had theorized before I left.
--bill
