Re: Reply-To Munging

[Aaron Schrab]

At 23:29 -0500 18 Nov 1998, Vince Sabio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In short, munging (or adding) the REPLY-TO header has some very nice
> benefits -- most notably (and then I'll step down off my soap box),
> lists that DO NOT implement a REPLY-TO <list> header require that you
> perform a "group" reply, also known as a "reply to all." This includes

No, it's your mailer that requires you to do that.  My mailer (Mutt) has
a list-reply function.  I used it to start this message, and it's going
just to the list with no editing on my part.

I say the answer isn't lists that take the choice away from the users,
but smarter software.

-- 
Aaron Schrab     [EMAIL PROTECTED]      http://www.execpc.com/~aarons/
 [Coca-Cola] isn't great, but it's better than religion.
 At least Coke gives you something.  -- Penn Jillette