At Friday 4/23/99 12:06, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > [deleted] > >If and when you (or anybody else) ever finds either (a) an SMTP sending >agent that ignores 5xx error responses or else (b) the Loch Ness monster, >I would appreciate being informed. b) http://www.lochness.co.uk/ http://www.strangemag.com/nessie.home.html http://www.geo.ed.ac.uk/home/scotland/monster.html more references available upon request Victor A. Wagner, Jr. PGP RSA fingerprint = 4D20 EBF6 0101 B069 3817 8DBF C846 E47A PGP D-H fingerprint = 98BC 65E3 1A19 43EC 3908 65B9 F755 E6F4 63BB 9D93 The five most dangerous words in the English language: "There oughta be a law"
- Re: responding vs. spamming murr rhame
- Re: responding vs. spamming Mally
- Re: responding vs. spamming David Shaw
- Re: responding vs. spamming Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: responding vs. spamming David Shaw
- Re: responding vs. spamming Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: responding vs. spamming David Shaw
- Re: responding vs. spamming Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: responding vs. spamming Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: responding vs. spamming Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: responding vs. spamming Victor A. Wagner, Jr.
- Re: responding vs. spamming Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: responding vs. spamming Norbert Bollow
- Re: responding vs. spamming Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: responding vs. spamming Cyndi Norman
