At 10:08 PM 4/30/99 -0700, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
>But I don't worry about it. but it IS, I think, another argument FOR 
>mail-back validation, because you have a nice proof that it wasn't 
>unsolicited or forged.

Good point, but who keeps those around? Is a few lines (which doesn't 
include the "auth" part) in the Majordomo log good enough to "prove" 
validation?

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium

Reply via email to