In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
John R Levine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I can't tell from RFC822 if Date is a required field or not
>> 'cause all that meta notation makes my eyes glaze over.
>
>According to RFC822, the date header is required, but I've never seen an
>MTA that would reject a message for lacking a date.
There are some. Sorry, I can't give you any names, but I know that there
are some.
The IMRSS test messages had to be modified to include a Date: header on
account of this.
-- Ron Guilmette, Roseville, California ---------- E-Scrub Technologies, Inc.
-- Deadbolt(tm) Personal E-Mail Filter demo: http://www.e-scrub.com/deadbolt/
-- FREE Web Harvester Protection - http://www.e-scrub.com/wpoison/ - Try it!
-- FREE DynamicIP Spam Filtering - http://www.imrss.org/dssl/ - TELL YOUR ISP!