Per-mailing-list subject-line tags are an abomination. Use of proper mailing list management software (which provides a consistent "To:" line, doesn't munge the headers, etc.) and use of any reasonable filtering software on the part of the recipients alleviates the need for them, thus providing a vastly more elegant and scalable solution. (Consider that there are already at least three mailing lists about HTML. Which one should get to use [HTML] as the tag? What if they all want to?) Either people get so much mail they need to filter, or they don't. People who need to filter, should, and if they insist on not doing so, then that's *their* problem, not the mailing list managers'. ---Rsk Rich Kulawiec [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Subject Prefix Tim Pierce
- Re: Subject Prefix Rasmus Lerdorf
- Re: Subject Prefix Gary E Bickford
- Re: Subject Prefix David W. Tamkin
- Re: Subject Prefix Rasmus Lerdorf
- Re: Subject Prefix David W. Tamkin
- Re: Subject Prefix Jeremy Blackman
- Re: Subject Prefix Denis Olivier [368859]
- Re: Subject Prefix JT
- Re: Subject Prefix David W. Tamkin
- Re: Subject Prefix Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Subject Prefix Denis Olivier [368859]
- Re: Subject Prefix Denis Olivier [368859]
- per-user subject tag option (was Subject Prefi... David W. Tamkin
- Re: per-user subject tag option (was Subje... Bernie Cosell
- Re: per-user subject tag option (was S... JT
- Re: per-user subject tag option (w... Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: per-user subject tag opti... Jeremy Blackman
- Re[2]: per-user subject tag o... Monbebe Admin
- Re: per-user subject tag option (was S... tibbs
- Re: per-user subject tag option (w... Bernie Cosell
