Chuq Von Rospach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 11:12 PM -0500 8/24/99, Adam Bailey wrote: > >> Read the headers. Other than not being compliant with LISTSERV, >> there's nothing wrong with AOL's error messages. > > AOL's actually a lot more reliable than most sites. I feel perfectly > comfortable removing a "user unknown" on the first bounce with AOL > than with anyone, where I usually wait a while to make sure.... Well, even I wouldn't go that far. AOL, like any giant site, has a tendency to have the occasional bad day where it sends out thousands of erroneous error messages. But those are usually easy to spot; when you have fifty of your AOL subscribers suddenly generating errors, it's a good idea to give them a day. -- Adam Bailey | Chicago, Illinois [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Finger/Web for PGP [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.lull.org/adam/
- Re: Useless NDRs [Was: Nondeliverable mail] Nick Simicich
- Re: Useless NDRs [Was: Nondeliverable mail] Jeffrey Goldberg
- Re: Useless NDRs [Was: Nondeliverable mail] John R Levine
- Re: Useless NDRs [Was: Nondeliverable mail] Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Useless NDRs [Was: Nondeliverable mail] Jeffrey Goldberg
- Re: Useless NDRs [Was: Nondeliverable mail] Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Useless NDRs [Was: Nondeliverable ma... Istvan Berkeley
- Re: Useless NDRs [Was: Nondeliverab... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Useless NDRs [Was: Nondeliverab... Adam Bailey
- Re: Useless NDRs [Was: Nondeliverab... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Useless NDRs [Was: Nondeliverab... Adam Bailey
- Re: Useless NDRs [Was: Nondeliverab... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Useless NDRs [Was: Nondeliverab... John R Levine
- Re: Useless NDRs David W. Tamkin
- Re: Useless NDRs [Was: Nondeliverab... Jeffrey Goldberg
- Re: Useless NDRs [Was: Nondeliverab... Miles Fidelman
- Re: Useless NDRs [Was: Nondeliverab... John R Levine
- Re: Useless NDRs [Was: Nondeliverab... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Useless NDRs [Was: Nondeliverab... Daniel Reed
