At 12:07 AM 11/19/99 -0600, Istvan Berkeley wrote: >simply, spam is technically illegal. My policy is to be VERY aggressive >about spam (1,000 auto-dialled collect calls etc.) Aren't annoying/harassing phone calls illegal also? And since they (apparently) pay for the phone calls, they CAN prove monetary damages and sue you. No, the high road is best. When johnny hits you, hitting back will only cause johnny to hit you again, and then the teacher will send you BOTH to the corner for a time out. SRE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.climber.org/eckert/ Info on peak climbing email lists mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Never settle with words what you can accomplish with a flame thrower.
- AOL Situation Resolved Nicole Marie Spring
- Re: AOL Situation Resolved Jeffrey Goldberg
- Juno bounces (was Re: AOL Situation Resolved) SRE
- Re: Juno bounces (was Re: AOL Situation R... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: AOL Situation Resolved Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: AOL Situation Resolved Bernie Cosell
- Re: AOL Situation Resolved Ronald F. Guilmette
- Stupid low tech idea Istvan Berkeley
- Re: Stupid low tech idea Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: Stupid low tech idea SRE
- Re: Stupid low tech idea Istvan Berkeley
- Re: AOL Situation Resolved Jeremy Blackman
- Listserver registry? (was Re: AOL Situati... Jeremy Blackman
- Re: Listserver registry? (was Re: AOL... Ronald F. Guilmette
- mailman vs. majordomo2 vs. sympa Miles Fidelman
- Re: mailman vs. majordomo2 vs. sympa JT
- Opinions on Topica, please John Stevenson
- Re: Opinions on Topica, please SRE
- Anybody else having problems with Yah... Andrew P. Tasi
- Re: Anybody else having problems... John R Levine
