At 05:39 AM 11/23/99 +0100, you wrote:
>But, much worse, Onelist.com doesn't seem to care at all.
No, they don't.
> I've
>written several complaints (they are appended below), and I get
>absolutely no response at all,
No, they don't respond to complaints. Should you persist via phone, you
will find that they still don't care (the person I have spoken with on
several occasions was Shana).
>even though this is a blatant
>violation not only of common Internet standards and policies
>against spamming, but of their own stated policies.
Yes, they violate their own written policies while denying that.
> I can only
>conclude that Onelist.com doesn't care, or perhaps they even
>support this spamming.
>
>If Onelist.com acts against its own stated policies, doesn't that
>mean that they cannot be trusted at all?
Seems reasonable.
>If Onelist.com supports spamming, or doesn't do anything to
>protect its users from spamming, then shouldn't it be added to
>lists over spam sites?
Seems reasonable.
>Shouldn't Onelist.com be blacklisted?
The only thing I have to add to this is that many people don't have a
viable alternative that I am aware of. Please tell me otherwise.
>Have other people here tried Onelist.com, and experienced the
>same?
Answered that I think.
>Thomas Gramstad
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Carrie Lybecker
