At 10:16 AM 3/13/00 -0800, Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote: >A thought sparked by a very different discussion about a very different >protocol: > >What if the list software did VERPs on one out every hundred messages, or >maybe on only one message a day? Would you then get the list-cleaning >advantages without the costs of doing it on every message? I solved this problem in a vey simple way. The bounce software sets a flag when it gets a bounce it can't fend. The delivery software then verps and resets the flag. No unparsable bounces, no verps. An unparsable bounce? One verp. -- That which does not kill us, makes us stronger. That which does kill us makes us smell stronger, after a few days, anyway. Nick Simicich mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://scifi.squawk.com/njs.html -- Stop by and Light Up The World!
- VERPs versus batched delivery Tim Pierce
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery Russ Allbery
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery Tim Pierce
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery Bernie Cosell
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery Russ Allbery
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery Vince Sabio
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery John Levine
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery Michelle Dick
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery Nick Simicich
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery David W. Tamkin
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery Tim Pierce
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery David W. Tamkin
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery Michelle Dick
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery Russ Allbery
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery Joe Smith
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery Roger Fajman
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: VERPs versus batched delivery mark david mcCreary
