On Wed, Jul 12, 2000 at 01:45:26PM -0400, Tom Neff wrote:
> I disagree, because MLM authors have a duty to avoid relying on dangerous
> syntaxes like BestServ's pointy-delimited ID string.
What exactly is dangerous about angle brackets <> in the Subject: line?
> It's much harder for
> AOL to try and be "super-smart" to protect its members from malicious HTML
How can angle brackets in a subject line be "malicious HTML"?
HTML, if present, is in the body of the message, not the headers.
-Joe
--
Joe Smith WorldCom, Global Data Network Ops, Product Technical Support
UNIX and Tech Sup: TYMNET Network, Xstream Packet Services (Public X.25)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2560 N 1st St, MS-5046/746, San Jose, CA 95131
Voice: 408-533-6220 = vnet 854-6220 Fax: 408-533-6702 = vnet 854-6702
- Re: AOL changing subject headers? Dave Sill
- Re: AOL changing subject headers? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: AOL changing subject headers? Rachel Blackman
- Re: AOL changing subject head... Mitch Collinsworth
- Re: AOL changing subject head... Cyndi Norman
- Re: AOL changing subject headers? Alan S. Harrell
- Re: AOL changing subject headers? Adam Bailey
- Re: AOL changing subject headers? Tom Neff
- Re: AOL changing subject headers? Dave Sill
- Re: AOL changing subject headers? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: AOL changing subject headers? Joe Smith
- Re: AOL changing subject headers? Adam Bailey
- Re: AOL changing subject headers? Adam Bailey
- Re: AOL changing subject headers? Michael C. Berch
- RE: AOL changing subject headers? Tegels, Kent
- Re: AOL changing subject headers? Berg
